ΔΩΡΕΑΝ ΜΕΤΑΦΟΡΙΚΑ ΚΑΙ ΑΝΤΙΚΑΤΑΒΟΛΗ ΓΙΑ ΑΓΟΡΕΣ ΑΝΩ ΤΩΝ 80€

MENU

Adult Money and you may Sexual Options Contour Mating Possibilities

Emlen and you will Oring (1977) ideal one to polygamy is more most likely whenever you to definitely sex cannot give adult care and you will/otherwise whenever adult care requirements try apparently limited. They at exactly the same time recommended that monogamy is far more likely to occur when the opportunity of monopolizing numerous friends are low and when physical fitness are optimized giving proper care to most recent youngsters ( Emlen and you can Oring, 1977 ). These types of facts was basically prolonged up on lately, and then we now have an even more complete knowledge of the latest complex relationship anywhere between worry, companion monopolization, sexual selection, and you can mating systems.

In lots of dogs, you to intercourse is generally the newest choosier gender together with almost every other sex was companion minimal and you will engages in partner race and you may/otherwise attraction ( Darwin, 1871 ; assessed in the Andersson, 1994 ). As mentioned in the last part, this new spouse limited sex tend to sense apparently solid intimate possibilities in the event the some anybody enjoys characteristics that enable these to monopolize of a lot reverse-gender friends ( Emlen and Oring, 1977 ; assessed recently inside the Klug et al., 2010 ). Such as for instance, sexual options can be prefer faculties you to definitely boost mating triumph and you can spouse monopolization, eg assaulting feature, increased human body size, traits which might be liked by the contrary sex, and you can characteristics that increase fertilization success (examined in Andersson, 1994 ). Overall, males tend to be mate minimal and you can sense deeper intimate options and you will ladies is the choosier gender and you may sense relatively weaker intimate alternatives (examined into the Clutton-Brock and Parker, 1992 ), even in the event in certain gender-role stopped expertise, boys may be the choosier intercourse and you will people are lover limited.

If you’re greater lady money inside gametes may affect mate access and you can the near future reproductive solutions that each and every sex enjoy, we currently remember that earlier investment by yourself doesn’t drive sex variations in coming financing (examined inside the Kokko and you will Jennions, 2008 )

Over the years, sex variations in adult money were used to spell it out as to why males are partner minimal and you can ladies selective ( Trivers, 1972 ). Trivers (1972) detailed you to definitely women, by meaning, create large gametes than just guys, and as a result enjoys deeper pre-mating adult money than males. Trivers (1972) argued one females tend to be more planning features greater post-mating parental capital than men because of their seemingly large pre-mating parental financial support. In addition, while the girls make huge gametes, boys are essential to return to the mating pond quicker than female after mating. Because of this, the latest relatively high potential reproductive rate (PRR; Clutton-Brock and Parker, 1992 ) of men will generate a masculine-biased OSR, and that therefore might have been predicted to lead to greater sexual possibilities to your male characteristics and you will a great mating system in which some boys monopolize and you will lover having numerous ladies ( Clutton-Brock and you will Vincent, 1991; Clutton-Brock and you may Parker, 1992 ; analyzed for the Kokko and you can Jennions, 2008 ). These two predictions – (1) one to female will receive greater article-mating investment as they have already spent a great deal more on gametes than just men and you may (2) one a somewhat higher male PRR and male-biased OSR often end up in relatively solid sexual possibilities into boys – were expected lately.

Intimate options can ergo provides strong affects on mating figure and you will this new ensuing mating program

Dawkins and Carlisle (1976) noted one prior resource must not fundamentally affect future resource, plus the prediction that lady will get greater adult financing than males simply because have previously spent a lot more when you look at the gametes than simply men commits the brand new Concorde fallacy ( Dawkins and you will Carlisle, 1976; Queller, 1997 ). Women and men, but not, manage disagree in ways, and these differences make a difference to parental financing, sexual options, and finally, mating system. Including, men and women you’ll disagree in the (1) the costs and/or benefits of taking proper care and you can/or fighting for friends, (2) the capacity to bring adult care and attention (elizabeth.grams., one gender might be struggling to bring crucial kinds of care), (3) confidence from parentage, (4) spouse accessibility, and (5) the expenses and you may/or IOS dating review benefits of partner preference ( Queller, 1997; Houston and you can McNa; Klug et al., 2012 ). Eg variations is also, in turn, connect with mating program figure.

MENU

Ο ιστότοπος χρησιμοποιεί Cookies για τη σωστή πλοήγηση σας